Politics

GIJ students need grammar lessons more than clothes ban

Of all the things one expected to hear announced at the Ghana Institute of Journalism’s matriculation, a ban on mini skirts and shorts was not on the list. In 2016, one expected to hear the importance of independent thought, voracious reading and rigorous research reiterated at the ceremony.

But speaking at the matriculation ceremony for the 2016/2017 group of new students the Rector of GIJ,  Dr Wilberforce Dzisah announced the ban saying:  “management has raised concerns about an increase in indecent dressing by students. Management has therefore decided on the following and this should not only go to fresh men and women but for the continuing students as well. No shorts or miniskirts are to be worn for lectures. Clothes which expose your vital parts shall not be entertained.”

One is shocked by the announcement but not completely surprised by it. GIJ is joining a long list of Ghanaian institutions using Victorian ideas of propriety to control women’s bodies for men. Here is my theory. I don’t believe that the school authorities meant to ban shorts for men. I think it was added to make the idiotic ban seem fair. I believe what the school truly wanted to ban was miniskirts and whatever else the school administration deems indecent for women to wear.

A  statement issued by the Women’s Commissioner of GIJ Suriaya Gomda, confirmed my theory: “As the Women’s Commissioner of GIJ, my take on the ban of mini skirts on campus by management is not out of place. GIJ is a professional school, and a noble institution for that matter; and ladies should dress accordingly. Ladies on campus should respect the presence of male lecturers and their colleague-males. Let us not pretend that as ladies, our sense of fashion have resounding impact on them. Students who are aspiring to be professionals should allow themselves to be groomed by existing structures, conventions and situational laws.”

The contents of Suriaya Gomda’s statement is the reason GIJ’s management should not be focusing on what students wear to classes but rather teach them logical reasoning, and of course, how to write coherent statements. Her incomprehensible statement aside, Suriaya Gomda shines more light on the mindset behind the clothes ban. The ban was made for men.

This ban is someone in management’s paternalistic plan to protect women students from all kinds of sexual harassment, rape, unsolicited touching and groping and sexual violence. But male students and lecturers are not dogs. They are human beings equipped with self-control. If women’s clothes have ‘resounding impact’ on them, they can look away. They should not be policing women’s bodies or clothes for men on campus. If anything, management should be introducing sexual harassment laws and creating safe spaces for women and men students to reports cases of sexual violations.

The problem with this ban isn’t that it is sexist, and very, very stupid but that instead concerning itself with what is needed to train journalists who tell compelling stories and speak truth to power, the GIJ management is focused on the clothes of students. Editors across the country will testify to the syntax/grammar/simple subject-verb agreement challenges of GIJ graduates.  Because while there are some GIJ graduates who do impressive and excellent work, there are many who were failed by the teachers who taught them. The students need the management to make sure lecturers show up and teach. Students will be better served by management if they ensured lessons are not only theoretical as a former graduate wrote in this essay.

This arbitrary ban is just daft. It  sexualizes women students and strips them of their right to self-expression through their clothes.  What length of skirt will be considered appropriate and by whom?  How does one determine what is short as the same length of skirts will look different on different body shapes and sizes? What does the university deem as vital body parts? The bum, breasts, or legs? How do they plan to enforce this ban?
GIJ is a university or aspiring to be one. There are no secular universities in the world that have a dress code for women. Even if the management found the way students dressed concerning, there are better ways to ensure ‘decency.’ But the ban in its current form is  dangerous. It  places the burden of control on the women and makes them responsible for the behavior of male students and teachers. This will make it hard for women to report sexual harassment cases in an environment where men feel entitled to their bodies.

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “GIJ students need grammar lessons more than clothes ban

  1. Talking about ” …right to self-expression through their clothes”, I think if there is any person or group of people who should be talking of rights, then it is (a) lawyer(s). But rather, students of law school are given dress codes and they don’t complain.

    The GSL students for the 2016/2017 academic year have started school. Below is what is contained in the admission letters of the students:

    “The Ghana School of Law enforces strict rules on the mode of dressing for all students during classes and other formal occasions. Accordingly, all students will be admitted to classes and other formal occasions dressed in the manner set out below:

    Male Students:

    White shirts, black trousers and tie
    Black suit
    Black pair of shoes and dark pair of socks. Slippers and sandals are not allowed.

    Female Students:

    White shirts/blouse with black skirt or black pair of trousers with black pair of shoes
    Black suit with black pair of shoes. Sandals and slippers are not allowed.

    You are to purchase the school jacket, which will be worn on special occasions.

    You are also required to purchase the school cloth:

    -Male – 3 yards

    -Female – 6 yards

    No wonder lawyers are more respected than journalists even if they are not more intelligent. You are addressed by the way you dress.

    Like

  2. Pingback: A Response To GIJ's Miniskirt Ban - GIJ Students Need Grammar Lessons More Than Clothes Ban - Ghanacelebrities.com

  3. This feminist calls the ban a Victorian idea? That is like calling Dzisah and GIJ management hypocritical and narrow minded. It is a ban on shorts and mini skirts! Stop highlighting one aspect of the ban. Boys and men get harassed too

    Like

  4. OMG! Due to my inability to control my “vital organ” at the sight of ladies in shorts/min skirts let’s therefore ban such clothes. May be the GIJ leadership has been radicalized by ISIS and needs to me investigated or this unfortunate decision was a “Locker Room Talk” made public by a drunk. Pure objectification of women shrouded in a general ban. Kwasia sem!

    Like

  5. I always thought “vital parts” were the heart, brain and lungs… You know – things used to sustain human LIFE?

    All that aside, the ban is idiotic and betrays a dearth in the ability to perform deep thinking.

    Liked by 1 person

    • What happened to propriety? What happened to decency? Forget about this so-called feminist thought or purely “academic ” write up and be realistic.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s